Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 20, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

In the arbitration process one or more arbitrators hear evidence from the parties to a dispute and then issue an “award” that declares who gets what. In some instances, the arbitrator may also write an “opinion” explaining the reasoning that led to the award. The award and opinion cannot be reviewed by a court, and there is no appeal. Arbitration is a substitute for a trial and review of a trial court’s decision by appellate courts. It is different from mediation.

There are several very good reasons to use arbitration rather than go to a court trial. Arbitration is less expensive than a formal court hearing — dramatically less. On average, a formal arbitration with one arbitrator, as of 2010, typically costs between two and three thousand dollars. An average trial from start to finish costs $19,000.

In addition, arbitration is private. This means that no one in the public will ever be made aware that there was even a dispute. This especially has benefits for private businesses who would rather not have their disputes dragged through the media.

Arbitrations are also more efficient. United States law requires that attorneys have the right to object to testimony and evidence during the course of a trial. In fact, if you’ve ever sat on a jury, you remember the drawn out bench meetings and recesses called to discuss these objections in detail. In an arbitration, there are no formal objections and all evidence is heard. This ensures that the case is truly decided on its merits instead of the arguing ability of the lawyers.

Another reason arbitration may (or may not) seem like a good choice is that arbitration is not binding. Even if you agree to go through binding arbitration, the decision is not actually binding if you completely disagree with it. In the case of binding arbitration, however, you will most likely be countersued in court for breach of contract. This is very different from a regular trial where, after the appeal is complete, the final decision is completely binding and enforced by the court.