Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Reviewed by Jeffrey Johnson
Managing Editor & Insurance Lawyer

UPDATED: Aug 20, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Even though a juvenile defendant does not have a right to a jury trial and the consequences that occur to them if convicted are less severe than they would be if their case were tried in adult court, any charge against a juvenile is still a crime. As this is the case, the judge who presides at trial must find that a juvenile defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to convict him of the crime.

Evidence in a Juvenile Delinquency Case

Proof that satisfies the reasonable doubt standard is the kind that is so clear and convincing an individual would be willing to rely on it in deciding matters of importance in his life, such as when to get married or when to buy a house. The proof required to satisfy the reasonable doubt standard is sufficient if it is to a reasonable, but not necessarily an absolute, certainty.

The beyond a reasonable doubt requirement for a conviction in a juvenile case can be met solely through direct evidence, solely through circumstantial evidence, or through a combination to the two types. Direct evidence, or the kind that stands on its own to establish or prove a given fact can be established through witness testimony. For example, direct evidence is witness testimony stating that the witness saw the defendant point the gun at the victim and pull the trigger.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Circumstantial Evidence

Circumstantial evidence is the kind of evidence that indirectly attempts to establish a given fact. Generally, this kind of evidence is presented to the fact finders as a series of events that lead to an asked for conclusion. For example, in a murder case, witness testimony stating that the witness heard a male voice in another room threaten to shoot someone, then a shot was heard, then a male was seen running from the room with a gun in his hand, is circumstantial evidence that the man shot the woman who was later found lying on the room’s floor. This evidence can be used to establish the juvenile defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as long as the fact finder believes it is credible.