Changes in Policy
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Changes in Policy
After working for an employer for 4 years, you have changed nothing about
yourself or your appearance from when you were hired, then they change the dress
code policy that clearly targets you and your appearance, is this a form of
discrimination? The majority of the changes are targeting females within the
office so would this be considered sexual discrimination?
Asked on April 18, 2017 under Employment Labor Law, Ohio
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 4 years ago | Contributor
It depends on whether there is a nonsexual reason for the changes or not. For example: if the employer has decided that translucent blouses, short skirts, excessive make-up, tube or tank tops, etc. are inappropriate and unprofessional, or that tatoos must be covered up, that is legal, because even if it is affecting women more than men, the reason has nothing to do with sex or gender: it's to have a professional and/or more uniform look. A change or policy is not discriminatory just because one sex is affected more, if there is non-sex, etc. reason for it. On the other hand, if woman are now being sexualized by being required to wear shorter or skimpier or more revealing outfits, that would likely be considered sex-based harassment or discrimination and you should contact the EEOC to discuss this.
More generally: employers may change dress codes or standards of appearance at will--the employer has free discretion in this regard.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.