Bad Faith Property Claim
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Bad Faith Property Claim
Initiated claim for burglary against my renters insurance 9/7/18 in Arizona. I
provided insurance all requested documents via fax within 60 days of their
request. The claim examiner sent several letters via email, one of which
appeared to acknowledge acceptance of some of the information. I’ve made
numerous attempts to contact claim examiner with no response and no denial.
There is a 1 year limitation of bringing action against the Insurance company
passed by several weeks, however the state regulation is 2 years. I have been
out of country for last 9 months tending to my wife while she is continuing
medical treatment in Canada.
My question is to this 1 yr limitation in my contract.
How strict is this held to?
What extenuation circumstance for which this would still be acknowledged by
Who would decide this?
How would I establish my circumstance as reason for this delay in filing suit?
I greatly appreciate your time in responding.
Asked on September 22, 2019 under Insurance Law, Arizona
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 2 years ago | Contributor
Contractual limitations on pursuing claims are generally strictly enforced: you agreed to them in the contract (i.e the policy), after all. The fact that your wife was undergoing medical care in Canada will not likely provide a legal basis to extend this time, since there is no reason you could not have filed a claim from Canada, either yourself or by hiring an AZ lawyer to file it for you--i.e. being with her for medical care would not prevent bringing the claim on a timely basis.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.