Bad Faith Claim
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Bad Faith Claim
We had a solar panel system that was destroyed 10 months ago. The insurance company sent a check for $14,000, however the system was 2 weeks old and cost $30,000. They are trying to replace it with an inferior setup and I have called every solar installer in the state and the cheapest one would do it for is $26,000. They have been caught lying several times and refuse to acknowledge any of the estimates. I had an engineering group that specializes in solar panel systems draw up a very detailed report showing why the third party installer they hired to come and bid it is so wrong and they still will not budge. Statute of limitations is getting close and I didn’t know if I had a claim or not? The insurance company knows nothing about solar and the third party they brought in is a joke.
Asked on May 13, 2017 under Insurance Law, Oklahoma
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 6 years ago | Contributor
An insurance policy is a contract: the insurer must pay when, and the amounts, required by the policy. If you feel--as you evidently do--that they are not honoring their policy obligations but are proceeding in bad faith and paying less than they should, file a "breach of contract" lawsuit against them now, if the statute of limitations is running out, to preserve your right to sue them. (Once the SOL runs out, it doesn't matter how good your claim is--it will be too late.)
In terms of how strong your case is likely to be, or even if you truly have a case: what does the policy say--do they have to pay the replacement value or otherwise replace the system? Or are they obligated to pay the then-current value of the system (what it was worth as of when it was destroyed)? Look to the policy to see what the obligation actually is.
If they have to replace it, then based on what you write, they are likely violating their obligations by looking to replace it with a system that is not comparable and ignoring estimates. But if they have to only pay its then current value, then ignore what you in fact paid (since it's possible you got a bad deal or overpaid) and get a realistic appreciaton for the true worth or value of the system as of when it was destroyed. If it's value was realistically $20k or less at the time, it's probably not worth taking legal action, since given the cost of litigation and and the fact that you most likely had a deductible, you might not really come out ahead through litigation, as compared to taking the $14k. But if the value was around $26k - $30k, then again, if they are ignoring evidence of its value, they are probably in breach of their obligations and a suit is likely worthwhile.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.