Aviation Accident Law: What Must You Prove To Win Your Case?
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Jul 16, 2021
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
From airplane crashes to injuries from rolling carts, aviation accidents happen every day. However, the burden of proof in an aviation accident case largely depends upon whether domestic or international law applies. As you’ll see, those burdens of proof are very different.
Burden of proof
A burden of proof is what the plaintiff in a case must prove to win her case. In aviation cases, burdens of proof can be categorized by domestic or international flights. We asked Larry Goldhirsch, a New York plaintiffs’ attorney with 38 years of experience whose practice represents aviation accident victims, to explain the differences in the types of aviation cases he handles. He told us:
The type of accident we handle depends on the facts and circumstances. For instance, on an international flight under the Montreal Convention (a treaty which regulates international aviation accidents), the passenger does not have to prove negligence against the airline. If a beverage cart injures someone and that injury is serious enough, such as a fracture or some other injury that is worth any lawyer’s attention, then the case could be litigated and we might take that case. It’s rather interesting that under foreign accidents, you don’t have to prove negligence.
Whereas in a local accident, a domestic accident, you have to prove that the airline was negligent, which means that the insurance company who is representing the airline is more inclined to settle a case without a trial if it involves an international accident.
The differences between the burdens of proof in a domestic versus an international case are also apparent when it comes to damages. Goldhirsch explained:
It’s a no fault system on international flights. However, like no fault that people may be familiar with in car accidents, the damages on international flights are limited to 100,000 SDRs (special drawing rights). It’s not 100,000 dollars. An SDR is a basket of currencies which is measured on an international average. Right now, it’s about $160,000.
So, if you’re injured on an international flight, you can get up to $160,000 of damages without having to prove negligence. Now, if your damages exceeded that amount and you didn’t want to accept that amount in settlement, then you would have to prove negligence against the international airline company. That’s different than in domestic cases in which you would have to prove negligence even for $1,000.
If you’ve been injured in an aviation accident, contact an experienced lawyer whose practice focuses in this area of the law to discuss your situation. Consultations are free, without obligation and are strictly confidential.