Asset Forfeiture

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Oct 10, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Asset forfeiture is a term used to describe the government’s confiscation of assets either determined to be the proceeds of crime, or funds and property used to perpetuate criminal activity. An example of the latter could be cars used to transport illegal drugs.

There are two types of forfeiture cases: criminal and civil. Almost all forfeiture cases practiced today are civil. In theory, civil actions are remedial, not punitive like criminal proceedings. Typically, criminal asset forfeiture proceedings occur as part of a sentence following a conviction. The same statutes apply to both types of proceedings—18 U.S.C. §982, through cross-referencing, creates a framework of offenses and procedures governing this type of forfeiture, as does 21 U.S.C. §881.

In civil asset forfeiture proceedings, a criminal charge or conviction is not required to seize. Notice occurs through presentation of the warrant and publication in a newspaper. If a party files a claim within the answer period, a civil hearing commences. In uncontested situations, the forfeiture may be handled administratively.

Civil asset forfeiture hearings include a plaintiff (the United States in the case of Federal forfeitures), a defendant, and the property in question. The owner is effectively put in the position of being a third party claimant. Civil hearings involve a more lenient burden of proof than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Once the government establishes probable cause that the property is subject to forfeiture, the owner must prove by “preponderance of the evidence” that it is not.

Most forfeiture activity occurs under Federal law, through the Department of Justice’s Asset Forfeiture Program, and most is connected to the War on Drugs.

In the case of a civil proceeding, the innocence of the property owner is typically not a defense. The owner may argue that no crime ever occurred or that the government lacked probable cause. Should these defenses succeed, the government returns the property to the owner. Such cases can cost the property owner upwards of $10,000 and take several months to resolve.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption