Arizona Car Accident Insurance Law: Understanding First & Third Party Claims
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Feb 20, 2020
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Insurance companies have different relationships with those who are involved in car accidents’ and those relationships often dictate how, and how fast, they handle claims. Here’s a quick overview of the differences between first and third party claims from our legal expert on Arizona car accidents.
First party vs. third party claims
We asked Dave Wattel, an Arizona attorney who has been handling plaintiffs’ cases exclusively for over 20 years, to explain the difference between first and third party claims and how insurance companies adjust claims according to those relationships. Here’s what he told us:
If it’s a first-party claim, that is you’re dealing with your own carrier, they have to adjust [claims] within a reasonable period of time’ the definition of which is always open for discussion. With a third-party carrier or third-party claim, you’ve got to understand that that carrier owes nothing to the claimant. The defendant that causes the accident, allegedly, is not responsible for paying the claimant or the victim anything until a judge and jury renders a decision and a judgment has been obtained.
Obligations to pay & defend
The insurance company that insures the defendant has two obligations and two obligations only, according to Wattel,’One, its obligation to pay. Two, its obligation to defend. However, both of those are the insurance company’s choice. So when they make a low ball offer, or no offer, to a victim or claimant, they’re essentially saying, ‘We don’t think much of your claim and we’re confident that we’re willing to elect our duty to defend obligation under the terms of the policy.’
‘Or they may just say, ‘Hey listen. We’re choosing to defend this claim along with other claims because that’s our business model at present and we think that it will save us money in the long run.’ They think that if they get tough and force the plaintiff’s bar to litigate that some plaintiff’s lawyers might not take those cases and may settle them short of full value.’
Wattel says that you’ve got to understand that in a third-party setting, even though the person stopped at a red light and got slammed from behind, the insurance company that insures the defendant who causes the accident has no obligation to offer anything because the obligation is to the insured, not to the victim of the accident.
If you’ve been injured in an auto accident or want to know more about what obligations your insurance company owes you, contact an experienced auto accident attorney for a free consultation.