i had a dryer fire and ins. did not pay. i fixed myself. Noew 6 mo. later new ins. disclosed fire ) There was a major accidental fire.Ruled by them
Free Insurance Quote Comparison
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Mar 25, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Insurance Question from Butlerville, OH
Asked on 03/25/2013
i had a dryer fire and ins. did not pay. i fixed myself. Noew 6 mo. later new ins. disclosed fire ) There was a major accidental fire.Ruled by them My first ins I had 22 yrs. It was definately the motor of dryer alot ot contents but no real s Ttructural damages. It was cheaper to paint clean than to sue.If I had money for both I would have sued. still have 6 wks. The Damage that was in the ceiling is where the fire dept. tore through the ceiling. A fire now in my attic and caused 80,000.00 damages. Everything was moving along I did disclose the prior fire .They took all salvagables to be cleaned. Now they contacted me and want me to deal with thier lawyers .Do i need lawyeror should i cont. to work with them,they det. faulty fireplace
Answer given on March 28, 2013
It’s not clear as the fire department involvement-is it the first fire or the 2nd. Also the time frame between the two fires is unclear.If the first fire had anything to do with the 2nd fire, you could have problems with the insurance company as to what damage occurred when. If the first fire caused the 2nd fire, there again could be issues with the insurance company.It is unusal for an insurance company to say to speak with their legal department. The adjuster should communicate if they are covering the claim or not and then explain why or why not. If this has not occurred you should ask to speak to a supervisor so they can explain what they are intending to do. Since fire damage is covered by the homeowner policy there should be no issue of whether there is coverage or not unless they are determining that the first fire is the actual cause of the second. Get clarification before making any further decisions.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: These answers are for general information purposes only and are provided by the person answering and FreeAdvice.com AS IS. It has not necessarily been reviewed by the management staff of FreeAdvice.com nor is it binding any insurance agent, broker, or other insurance professional or any attorney or insurance company. Insurance laws, regulations and practices vary from state to state and insurance policies and practices differ from company to company, by type of policy, by state and locality and by type of insurance. Tiny variations in the facts, policy language or a detail not set forth in a question often can change the outcome or a professional's conclusion. Although FreeAdvice.com has confirmed that the answer(s) was/were provided for the account of an experienced insurance professional, that professional may not be licensed in the state referred to in the question, and may not be experienced or up to date in the subject area. Unlike the answers provided here, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you consult a licensed insurance professional in your area or retain a licensed attorney listed on AttorneyPages.com to represent you.