Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 2, 2011

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Insurance Question from Bothell, WA

Asked on 02/02/2011

If an entitiy is shown as an “additional insured” on an ACORD certificate of liability insurance, is there a need for the entity to be a “loss payee?” Would there be any advantage for an entity to be listed as an "additional insured" and as a "loss payee" on a liability insurance policy? Does being listed as an additional insured offer greater protection or coverage than being shown as a loss payee?

Answer given on February 02, 2011

Additional insured and loss payee are totally different entities.  As additional insured, you are being protected on a liability basis.  For loss payee it is protection for property.  It is rare that someone or some business would want to be listed as both for the same business/exposure.

Loss Payee is generally used for loans on vehicles and is sometimes a term used for real property, such as a mortgagee on residential or business property.

The additional insured endorsement is used for someone who is exposed on a liability basis due to the fact they may hire someone to do a job that could incur a liability loss.  An example may be a contractor or tree service.  The company hiring them to do the job, may ask to be an additional insured.  Also, sometimes if a company is using a franchise name, the main company may ask to be an additional insured to protect them if something is done that creates a liability exposure to the franchise.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: These answers are for general information purposes only and are provided by the person answering and FreeAdvice.com AS IS. It has not necessarily been reviewed by the management staff of FreeAdvice.com nor is it binding any insurance agent, broker, or other insurance professional or any attorney or insurance company. Insurance laws, regulations and practices vary from state to state and insurance policies and practices differ from company to company, by type of policy, by state and locality and by type of insurance. Tiny variations in the facts, policy language or a detail not set forth in a question often can change the outcome or a professional's conclusion. Although FreeAdvice.com has confirmed that the answer(s) was/were provided for the account of an experienced insurance professional, that professional may not be licensed in the state referred to in the question, and may not be experienced or up to date in the subject area. Unlike the answers provided here, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you consult a licensed insurance professional in your area or retain a licensed attorney listed on AttorneyPages.com to represent you.