Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Reviewed by Jeffrey Johnson
Managing Editor & Insurance Lawyer

UPDATED: Jan 17, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Insurance Question from Arlington, TX

Asked on 01/17/2012

What is the purpose of a law to have insurance if it is not going to be enforced?? A car slammed into the back of me while I was stopped in a line of traffic. The insurance company insuring the other vehicle denied my claim because "any person not listed on the policy is automatically excluded". Why is such a policy legal when the purpose is not justified for the innocent party involved when the fault of another letting someone else drive their vehicle causes damages and injuries to be left for the one suffering to pay? The person driving and owner of the car are just free of any charges for damages, pain, & suffering they caused me. Is there legal action I can seek?

Answer given on January 18, 2012

In most states, the insurance follows the vehicle.  Therefore, if you give permissive use to someone to drive your car and they get into an accident, their insurance on that vehicle will pay.  I am not sure what restrictive language is in this policy to allow them to decline this claim due to the fact that the owner was not driving.  You should definitely seek the advice of an attorney in this matter and let him file a claim for your injuries as well as the damage to your car.  To find an attorney in your area, click here.   


IMPORTANT NOTICE: These answers are for general information purposes only and are provided by the person answering and FreeAdvice.com AS IS. It has not necessarily been reviewed by the management staff of FreeAdvice.com nor is it binding any insurance agent, broker, or other insurance professional or any attorney or insurance company. Insurance laws, regulations and practices vary from state to state and insurance policies and practices differ from company to company, by type of policy, by state and locality and by type of insurance. Tiny variations in the facts, policy language or a detail not set forth in a question often can change the outcome or a professional's conclusion. Although FreeAdvice.com has confirmed that the answer(s) was/were provided for the account of an experienced insurance professional, that professional may not be licensed in the state referred to in the question, and may not be experienced or up to date in the subject area. Unlike the answers provided here, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you consult a licensed insurance professional in your area or retain a licensed attorney listed on AttorneyPages.com to represent you.