How to Investigate Copyright Status
January, 1991 page 1
HOW TO INVESTIGATE THE COPYRIGHT STATUS OF A WORK
Library of Congress
Washington, DC 20559
(blank version of cover)
HOW TO INVESTIGATE THE COPYRIGHT STATUS OF A WORK
METHODS OF APPROACHING A COPYRIGHT INVESTIGATION
There are several ways to investigate whether a work is under copyright protection and, if so, the facts of the copyright. These are the main ones:
1. Examine a copy of the work (or, if the work is a sound recording, examine the disk, tape cartridge, or cassette in which the recorded sound is fixed, or the album cover, sleeve, or container in which the recording is sold) for such elements as a copyright notice, place and date of publication, author and publisher (for additional information, see p. 6, "Copyright Notice")
2. Make a search of the Copyright Office catalogs and other records or
3. Have the Copyright Office make a search for you.
A FEW WORDS OF CAUTION ABOUT COPYRIGHT INVESTIGATIONS
Copyright investigations often involve more than one of these methods. Even if you follow all three approaches, the results may not be completely conclusive. Moreover, as explained in this circular, the changes brought about under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 must be considered when investigating the copyright status of a work. This circular offers some practical guidance on what to look for if you are making a copyright investigation. It is important to realize, however, that this circular contains only general information, and that there are a number of exceptions to the principles outlined here. In many cases it is important to consult a copyright attorney before reaching any conclusions regarding the copyright status of a work.
HOW TO SEARCH COPYRIGHT OFFICE CATALOGS AND RECORDS *******************************************
CATALOG OF COPYRIGHT ENTRIES
The Copyright Office publishes the CATALOG OF COPYRIGHT ENTRIES (CCE), in printed format from 1891 through 1978. From 1979 through 1982 the CCE was issued in microfiche format. The catolog was divided into parts according to the classes of works registered. Each CCE segment covered all registrations made during a particular period of time. Renewal registrations made from 1979 through 1982 are found in Section 8 of the catalog. Renewals prior to that time were generally listed at the end of the volume containing the class of work to which they pertained.
A number of libraries throughout the United States maintain copies of the CATALOG, and this may provide a good starting point if you wish to make a search yourself. There are some cases, however, in which a search of the CATALOG alone will not be sufficient to provide the needed information. For example:
* Since the CATALOG does not include entries for assignments or other recorded documents, it cannot be used for searches involving the ownership of rights.
* The CATALOG entry contains the essential facts concerning a registration, but it is not a verbatim transcript of the registration record. It does not contain the address of the copyright claimant.
Effective with registrations made since 1982, the only method of searching outside the Library of Congress is by using the Internet to access the automated catalog. The automated catolog contains entries from 1978 forward. See page 4 for accessing the catalog via the Internet.
INDIVIDUAL SEARCHES OF COPYRIGHT RECORDS
The Copyright Office is located in the Library of Congress James Madison Memorial Building, 101 Independence Ave., S.E., Washington, D.C. Most records of the Copyright Office are open to public inspection and searching from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday (except legal holidays). The various records freely available to the public include an extensive card catalog, an automated catalog containing records from 1978 forward, record books, and microfilm records of assignments and related documents. Other records, including correspondence files and deposit copies, are not open to the public for searching. However, they may be inspected upon request and payment of a $20-per hour search fee.
If you wish to do your own searching in the Copyright Office files open to the public, you will be given assistance in locating the records you need and in learning searching procedures. If the Copyright Office staff actually makes the search for you, a search fee must be charged. The search will not be done while you wait.
In addition, the following files dating from 1978 forward are now available over the Internet: COHM, which includes all materials except serials and documents; COHD, which includes documents; and COHS, which includes serials.
The Internet site addresses for the Copyright Office files are:
World Wide Web URL: https://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright Gopher: marvel.loc.gov Telnet: locis.loc.gov
The Copyright Office does not offer search assistance to users on the Internet.
SEARCHING BY THE COPYRIGHT OFFICE *****************************************
Upon request, the Copyright Office staff will search its records at the statutory rate of $20 for each hour or fraction of an hour consumed. Based on the information you furnish, we will provide an estimate of the total search fee. If you decide to have the Office staff conduct the search, you should send the estimated amount with your request. The Office will then proceed with the search and send you a typewritten report or, if you prefer, an oral report by telephone. If you request an oral report, please provide a telephone number where you can be reached during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. – 5 p.m. Eastern time). Search reports can be certified on request, for an extra fee of $20. Certified searches are most frequently requested to meet the evidentiary requirements of litigation. Your request, and any other correspondence, should be addressed to :
Reference and Bibliography Section, LM-451
Library of Congress
Washington, D.C. 20559
WHAT THE FEE DOES NOT COVER
Note that the search fee does NOT include the cost of additional certificates, photocopies of deposits, or copies of other Office records. For information concerning these services, request Circular 6.
The more detailed information you can furnish with your request, the less time-consuming and expensive the search will be. Please provide as much of the following information as possible:
* The title of the work, with any possible variants
* The names of the authors, including possible pseudonyms
* The name of the probable copyright owner, which may be the publisher or producer
* The approximate year when the work was published or registered
* The type of work involved (book, play, musical composition, sound recording, photograph, etc.)
* For a work originally published as a part of a periodical or collection, the title of that publication and any other information, such as the volume or issue number, to help identify it
* Motion pictures are often based on other works such as books or serialized contributions to periodicals or other composite works. If you desire a search for an underlying work or for music from a motion picture, you must specifically request such a search. You must also identify the underlying works and music and furnish the specific titles, authors, and approximate dates of these works and
* The registration number or any other copyright data.
SEARCHES INVOLVING ASSIGNMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AFFECTING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP
The Copyright Office staff will also, for the standard hourly search fee, search its indexes covering the records of assignments and other recorded documents concerning ownership of copyrights. The reports of searches in these cases will state the facts shown in the Office’s indexes of the recorded documents, but will offer no interpretation of the content of the documents or their legal effect.
LIMITATIONS ON SEARCHES
In determining whether or not to have a search made, you should keep the following points in mind:
NO SPECIAL LISTS
The Copyright Office does not maintain any listings of works by subject, or any lists of works that are in the public domain.
Individual works, such as stories, poems, articles, or musical compositions that were published as contributions to a copyrighted periodical or collection, are usually not listed separately by title in our records.
The Copyright Office does not search or compare copies of works to determine questions of possible infringement or to determine how much two or more versions of a work have in common.
TITLES AND NAMES NOT COPYRIGHTABLE
Copyright does not protect names and titles, and our records list many different works identified by the same or similar titles. Some brand names, trade names, slogans, and phrases may be entitled to protection under the general rules of law relating to unfair competition, or to registration under the provisions of the trademark laws. Questions about the trademark laws should be addressed to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Washington, D.C. 20231. Possible protection of names and titles under common law principles of unfair competition is a question of state law.
NO LEGAL ADVICE
The Copyright Office cannot express any opinion as to the legal significance or effect of the facts included in a search report.
SOME WORDS OF CAUTION
SEARCHES NOT ALWAYS CONCLUSIVE
Searches of the Copyright Office catalogs and records are useful in helping to determine the copyright status of a work, but they cannot be regarded as conclusive in all cases. The complete absence of any information about a work in the office records does not mean that the work is unprotected. The following are examples of cases in which information about a particular work may be incomplete or lacking entirely in the Copyright Office:
* Before1978, unpublished works were entitled to protection at common law without the need of registration.
* Works published with notice prior to 1978 may be registered at any time within the first 28-year term to obtain renewal protection, however, the claimant must register and renew such work by the end of the 28th year.
* For works that came under copyright protection after 1978, registration may be made at any time during the term of protection it is not generally required as a condition of copyright protection (there are, however, certain definite advantages to registration please call or write for Circular 1, "Copyright Basics").
* Since searches are ordinarily limited to registrations that have already been cataloged, a search report may not cover recent registrations for which catalog records are not yet available.
* The information in the search request may not have been complete or specific enough to identify the work.
* The work may have been registered under a different title or as part of a larger work.
PROTECTION IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
Even if you conclude that a work is in the public domain in the United States, this does not necessarily mean that you are free to use it in other countries. Every nation has its own laws governing the length and scope of copyright protection, and these are applicable to uses of the work within that nation’s borders. Thus, the expiration or loss of copyright protection in the United States may still leave the work fully protected against unauthorized use in other countries.
For further information, request Circulars 15, "Renewal of Copyright," 15a. "Duration of Copyright," 15t, "Extension of Copyright Terms," and 6, "Obtaining Copies of Copyright Office Records and Deposits," from:
Publications Section, LM-455
Library of Congress
Washington, D.C. 20559
You may call (202) 707-9100 at any time, day or night, to leave a request for forms or circulars as a recorded message on the Forms HOTLINE. Requests made on the HOTLINE number are filled and mailed promptly.
IMPACT OF COPYRIGHT ACT ON COPYRIGHT INVESTIGATIONS ***********************************
On October 19, 1976, the President signed into law a complete revision of the copyright law of the United States (Title 17 of the United States Code). Most provisions of this statute came into force on January 1, 1978, superseding the previous copyright act of 1909. These changes made significant changes in the copyright law. Futher important changes resulted from the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which took effect March 1, 1989, and the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-307) enacted June 26,1992, which amended the renewal provisions of the copyright law. If you need more information about the provisions of either the 1909 or the 1976 law, write or call the Copyright Office. For information about the Berne Convention Implementation Act, request Circular 93, "Highlights of U.S. Adherence to the Bernet Convention." For information about renewals, request Circular 15, "Renewal of Copyright." For single copies of the law only, request Circular 92, "Copyright Law of the United States of America," from:
Publications Section, LM-455
Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20559-6000
For multiple copies of the law, request "Copyright Law, Circular 92" $4.75 each, stock number 030-002-00182-9 from:
Superintendent of Documents
P.O. Box 371954
Pittsburgh, PA 1520-7954
Tel: (202) 783-3238
Fax: (202) 512-2250
For copyright investigations, the following are some of the main points to consider about the impact of the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988:
A CHANGED SYSTEM OF COPYRIGHT FORMALITIES
Some of the most sweeping changes under the 1976 Act involve copyright formalities that is, the procedural requirements for securing and maintaining full copyright protection. The old system of formalities involved copyright notice, deposit and registration, recordation of transfers and licenses of copyright ownership, and United States manufacture, among other things. In general, while retaining formalities, the 1976 law reduced the chances of mistakes, softened the consequences of errors and omissions, and allowed for the correction of errors.
The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 reduced formalities, most notably making the addition of the previously mandatory copyright notice optional. It should be noted that the amended notice requirements are not retroactive.
Under the present copyright law, copyright exists in original works of authorship created and fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly, or indirectly with the aid of a machine or device. In other words, copyright is an incident of creative authorship not dependent on statutory formalities. Thus, registration with the Copyright Office generally is not required, but there are certain advantages that arise from a timely registration. For further information on the advantages of registration, write or call the Copyright Office and request Circular 1, "Copyright Basics."
Both the 1909 and the 1976 copyright acts require a notice of copyright on published works. For most works, a copyright notice consists of the symbol þ, the word "Copyright," or the abbreviation "Copr.," together with the name of the owner of copyright and the year of first publication for example : "þ Joan Crane 1987" or "Copyright 1987 by Abraham Adams."
For sound recordings published on or after February 15, 1972, a copyright notice might read " 1987 XYZ Records, Inc." (See page 8 for more information about sound recordings.)
For mask works a copyright notice might read " SDR Industries." (Request Circular 100 for more information.)
The 1976 law prescribes that all visually perceptible published copies of a work, or published phonorecords of a sound recording, shall bear a proper copyright notice. This applies to such works published before March 1, 1989. After March 1, 1989, notice of copyright on these works is optional. Adding the notice, however, is strongly encouraged and, if litigation involving the copyright occurs, certain advantages exist for adding the notice.
The requirement for the notice under the 1976 law applied equally whether the work was published in the United States or elsewhere by authority of the copyright owner. Compliance with the statutory notice requirements was the responsibility of the copyright owner. Unauthorized publication without the copyright notice, or with a defective notice, does not affect the validity of the copyright in the work.
Advance permission from, or registration with, the Copyright Office is not required before placing a copyright notice on copies of the work, or on phonorecords of a sound recording. Moreover, for works first published on or after January 1, 1978 through February 28, 1989, omission of
the required notice, or use of a defective notice, did not result in forfeiture or outright loss of copyright protection. Certain omissions of, or defects in the notice of copyright, however, may lead to loss of copyright protection if certain steps are not taken to correct or cure the omissions or defects. The Copyright Office has issued a final regulation (37 CFR 201.20) which suggests various acceptable positions for the notice of copyright. For further information, write to the Copyright Office and request Circular 3,"Copyright Notice".
WORKS ALREADY IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN
Neither the 1976 Act, the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, nor the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 will restore protection to works that fell into the public domain before the passage of the laws. However, the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (NAFTA) and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) may restore copyright in certain works of foreign origin that were in the public domain in the United States. Under the copyright law in effect prior to January 1, 1978, copyright could be lost in several situations. The most common were publication without the required notice of copyright, expiration of the first 28-year term without renewal, or final expiration of the second copyright term. The Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 automatically renews first term copyrights secured between January 1, 1964 and December 31, 1977.
SCOPE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS UNDER COPYRIGHT
The present law has changed and enlarged in some cases, the scope of the copyright owner’s rights as against users of a work. The new rights apply to all uses of a work subject to protection by copyright after January 1, 1978, regardless of when the work was created.
DURATION OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ****************************************
WORKS ORIGINALLY COPYRIGHTED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 1978
A work that is created and fixed in tangible form for the first time on or after January 1, 1978, is automatically protected from the moment of its creation, and is ordinarily given a term enduring for the author’s life, plus an additional 50 years after the author’s death. In the case of "a joint work prepared by two or more authors who did not work for hire," the term lasts for 50 years after the last surviving author’s death. For works made for hire, and for anonymous and pseudonymous works (unless the author’s identity is revealed in the Copyright Office records), the duration of copyright will be 75 years from publication or 100 years from creation, whichever is less.
Works created before the 1976 law came into effect, but neither published nor registered for copyright before January 1, 1978, have been automatically brought under the statute and are now given Federal copyright protection. The duration of copyright in these works will generally be computed in the same way as for new works: the life-plus-50 or 75/100-year terms will apply. However, all works in this category are guaranteed at least 25 years of statutory protection.
WORKS COPYRIGHTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1978
Under the law in effect before 1978, copyright was secured either on the date a work was published with notice of copyright, or on the date of registration if the work was registered in unpublished form. In either case, copyright endured for a first term of 28 years from the date on which it was secured. During the last (28th) year of the first term, the copyright was eligible for renewal. The new copyright law has extended the renewal term from 28 to 47 years for copyrights in existence on January 1, 1978. However, the copyright still must be renewed in the 28th calendar year to receive the 47-year period of added protection. For more detailed information on the copyright term, write or call the Copyright Office and request Circulars 15a and 15t.
WORKS FIRST PUBLISHED BEFORE 1978: THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE *****************************************
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
In investigating the copyright status of works first published before January 1, 1978, the most important thing to look for is the notice of copyright. As a general rule under the previous law, copyright protection was lost permanently if the notice was omitted from the first authorized published edition of a work, or if it appeared in the wrong form or position. The form and position of the copyright notice for various types of works were specified in the copyright statute. Some courts were liberal in overlooking relatively minor departures from the statutory requirements, but a basic failure to comply with the notice provisions forfeited copyright protection and put the work into the public domain in this country.
ABSENCE OF COPYRIGHT NOTICE
For works first published before 1978, the complete absence of a copyright notice from a published copy generally indicates that the work is not protected by copyright. For works first published before March 1, 1989, the copyright notice is mandatory. Some works may contain a notice, others may not. The absence of a notice in March 1, 1989 and later works does not necessarily indicate that the work is in the public domain.
UNPUBLISHED WORKS. No notice of copyright was required on the copies of any unpublished work. The concept of "publication" is very technical, and it was possible for a number of copies lacking a copyright notice to be reproduced and distributed without affecting copyright protection.
FOREIGN EDITIONS. Under certain circumstances, the law exempted copies of a copyrighted work from the notice requirements if they were first published outside the United States. Some copies of these foreign editions could find their way into the United States without impairing the copyright.
ACCIDENTAL OMISSION. The 1909 statute preserved copyright protection if the notice was omitted by accident or mistake from a "particular copy or copies."
UNAUTHORIZED PUBLICATION. A valid copyright was not secured if someone deleted the notice and/or published the work without authorization from the copyright owner.
SOUND RECORDINGS. Reproductions of sound recordings usually contain two different types of creative works: the underlying musical, dramatic, or literary work that is being being performed or read, and the fixation of the actual sounds embodying the performance or reading. For protection of the underlying musical or literary work embodied in a recording, it is not necessary that a copyright notice covering this material appear on the phonograph records or tapes in which the recording is reproduced. As noted above, a special notice is required for protection of the recording of a series of musical, spoken, or other sounds which were fixed on or after February 15, 1972. Sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, are not eligible for Federal copyright protection. The Sound Recording Act of 1971, the present copyright law, and the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 cannot be applied or be construed to provide any retroactive protection for sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972. Such works, however, may be protected by various state laws or doctrines of common law.
THE DATE IN THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
If you find a copyright notice, the date it contains may be important in determining the copyright status of the work. In general, the notice on works published before 1978 must include the year in which copyright was secured by publication (or, if the work was first registered for copyright in unpublished form, the year in which registration was made). There are two main exceptions to this rule.
* For pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works (Classes F through K under the 1909 law) the law permitted omission of the year date in the notice.
* For "new versions" of previously published or copyrighted works, the notice was not usually required to include more than the year of first publication of the new version itself. This is explained further under "Derivative Works" below.
The year in the notice usually (though not always) indicated when the copyright began. It is therefore significant in determining whether a copyright is still in effect or, if the copyright has not yet run its course, the year date will help in deciding when the copyright is scheduled to expire. For further information about the duration of copyright, request Circular 15a.
In evaluating the meaning of the date in a notice, you should keep the following points in mind:
WORKS PUBLISHED AND COPYRIGHTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1978: A work published before January 1, 1978, and copyrighted within the past 75 years may still be protected by copyright in the United States if a valid renewal registration was made during the 28th year of the first term of the copyright. If renewed, and if still valid under the other provisions of the law, the copyright will expire 75 years from the end of the year in which it was first secured.
Therefore, the United States copyright in any work published or copyrighted more than 75 years ago (75 years from January 1st in the present year) has expired by operation of law, and the work has permanently fallen into the public domain in the United States. For example, on January 1, 1995, copyright in works first published or copyrighted before January 1, 1920, will have expired on January 1, 1996, copyright in works first published or copyrighted before January 1, 1921, will have expired.
WORKS FIRST PUBLISHED OR COPYRIGHTED BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1920, AND DECEMBER 31, 1949, BUT NOT RENEWED: If a work was first published or copyrighted between January 1, 1920, and December 31, 1949, it is important to determine whether the copyright was renewed during the last (28th) year of the first term of the copyright. This can be done by searching the Copyright Office records or catalogs, as explained above. If no renewal registration was made, copyright protection expired permanently on the 28th year date it was first secured.
WORKS FIRST PUBLISHED OR COPYRIGHTED BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1920, AND DECEMBER 31, 1949, AND REGISTERED FOR RENEWAL: When a valid renewal registration was made and copyright in the work was in its second term on December 31, 1977, the renewal copyright term was extended under the present act to 47 years. In these cases, copyright will last for a total of 75 years from the end of the year in which copyright was originally secured. Example: Copyright in a work first published in 1920, and renewed in 1948, will expire on December 31 , 1995.
WORKS FIRST PUBLISHED OR COPYRIGHTED BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1950, AND DECEMBER 31, 1977: If a work was in its first 28-year term of copyright protection on January 1, 1978, it must be renewed in a timely fashion to secure the maximum term of copyright protection provided by the present copyright law. If renewal registration is made during the 28th calendar year of its first term, copyright will endure for 75 years from the end of the year copyright was originally secured. If not renewed, the copyright expires at the end of its 28th calendar year.
UNPUBLISHED, UNREGISTERED WORKS: Before 1978, if a work had neither been "published" in the legal sense nor registered in the Copyright Office, it was subject to perpetual protection under the common law. On January 1, 1978, all works of this kind, subject to protection by copyright, were automatically brought under the Federal copyright statute. The duration of these Federal copyrights will vary, but none of them will expire before December 31, 2002.
In examining a copy (or a record, disk, or tape) for copyright information, it is important to determine whether that particular version of the work is an original edition of the work or a "new version." New versions include musical arrangements, adaptations, revised or newly edited editions, translations, dramatizations, abridgments, compilations, and works republished with new matter added. The law provides that derivative works are independently copyrightable and that the copyright in such a work does not affect or extend the protection, if any, in the underlying work. Under the 1909 law, courts have also held that the notice of copyright on a derivative work ordinarily need not include the dates or other information pertaining to the earlier works incorporated in it. This principle is specifically preserved in the present copyright law.
Thus, if the copy (or the record, disk, or tape) constitutes a derivative version of the work, these points should be kept in mind:
* The date in the copyright notice is not necessarily an indication of when copyright in all of the material in the work will expire. Some of the material may already be in the public domain, and some parts of the work may expire sooner than others.
* Even if some of the material in the derivative work is in the public domain and free for use, this does not mean that the "new" material added to it can be used without permission from the owner of copyright in the derivative work. It may be necessary to compare editions to determine what is free to use and what is not.
* Ownership of rights in the material included in a derivative work and in the preexisting work upon which it may be based may differ, and permission obtained from the owners of certain parts of the work may not authorize the use of other parts.
THE NAME IN THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Under the copyright statute in effect before 1978, the notice was required to include "the name of the copyright proprietor." The present act requires that the notice include "the name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner." The name in the notice (sometimes in combination with the other statements on the copy, record, disk, tape, container, or label) often gives persons wishing to use the work the information needed to identify the owner from whom licenses or permission can be sought. In other cases, the name provides a starting point for a search in the Copyright Office records or catalogs, as explained at the beginning in this circular.
In the case of works published before 1978, copyright registration is made in the name of the individual person or the entity identified as the copyright owner in the notice. For works published after 1978, registration is made in the name of the person or entity owning all the rights on the date the registration is made. This may or may not be the name appearing in the notice. In addition to its records of copyright registration, the Copyright Office maintains extensive records of assignments, exclusive licenses, and other documents dealing with copyright ownership.
Ad interim copyright was a special short-term copyright that applied to certain books and periodicals in the English language, first manufactured and published outside the United States. It was a partial exception to the manufacturing requirements of the previous United States copyright law. Its purpose was to secure temporary United States protection for a work, pending the manufacture of an edition in the United States. The ad interim requirements changed several times over the years, and were subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications.
The manufacturing provisions of the copyright act expired on July 1, 1986, and are no longer a part of the copyright law. The transitional and supplementary provisions of the act provide that for any work in which ad interim copyright was subsisting or capable of being secured on December 31, 1977, copyright protection would be extended for a term compatible with the other works in which copyright was subsisting on the effective date of the new act. Consequently, if the work was first published on or after July 1, 1977, and was eligible for ad interim copyright protection, the provisions of the present copyright act will be applicable to the protection of these works. Anyone investigating the copyright status of an English-language book or periodical first published outside the United States before July 1, 1977, should check carefully to determine:
* Whether the manufacturing requirements were applicable to the work and
* If so, whether the ad interim requirements were met.
— cut here —
SEARCH REQUEST FORM
Copyright Office Reference & Bibliography
Library of Congress Section
Washington, D.C. 20559 (202) 707-6850
8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. Monday-Friday
TYPE OF WORK:
__Book __Music __Motion Picture
__Drama __Sound Recording __Photograph/Artwork
__Map __Periodical __Contribution
__Computer Program __Mask Work
SEARCH INFORMATION YOU REQUIRE:
__Registration __Renewal __Assignment __Redirect URL
SPECIFICS OF WORK TO BE SEARCHED:
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT (if known):________ (name in copyright notice)
APPROXIMATE YEAR DATE OF PUBLICATION/CREATION:___
REGISTRATION NUMBER (if known):_______
OTHER IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:________
If you need more space please attach additional pages.
ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON THE COPYRIGHT OFFICE FEE OF $20.00 AN HOUR OR FRACTION OF AN HOUR CONSUMED. THE MORE INFORMATION YOU FURNISH AS A BASIS FOR THE SEARCH THE BETTER SERVICE WE CAN PROVIDE. THE TIME BETWEEN THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF YOUR FEE FOR THE SEARCH AND YOUR RECEIVING A REPORT WILL VARY FROM 8 TO 12 WEEKS DEPENDING ON WORKLOAD.
NAMES, TITLES, AND SHORT PHRASES ARE NOT COPYRIGHTABLE.
Please read Circular 22 for more information on copyright searches. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
YOUR NAME:______ DATE:___
ADDRESS:___________ __________ __________
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO. (____)________
Convey results of estimate/search by telephone? ___yes ___no
Fee Enclosed? ___yes Amount $___
— cut here —
COPYRIGHT OFFICE * LIBRARY OF CONGRESS * WASHINGTON, D.C. 20559
Note: This file has been edited for use on computer networks. This editing required the removal of diacritics and fonts such as italics and bold. You can obtain a copy of the original by writing to the Copyright Office at the above address.