Who is responsible for advising a condominium purchaser that the building diddid not have a certificate of occupancy When the transaction closed

PURCHASED A condo for all cash went to the closing August 31, 2016
found out Felix later the building doesnot have a certificate of occupancy?

Asked on June 26, 2017 under Real Estate Law, New York


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 3 years ago | Contributor

Don't withhold HOA dues--this had nothing to do with the HOA, and if you fail to pay your dues, you could be sued by them, or have them put a lien on your property.
It is the seller who was obligated to either make sure there was a Certificate of Occupancy or, at  minimum, to disclose up front (before you signed the contract) that there was none, so you could decide whether or not to make an offer. A failure to disclose a known material or important fact like this can be fraud; fraud can provide a basis for recovering compensation, such as the cost(s) involved in getting a C of O. You should therefore be able to sue the seller based on fraud for your costs or losses.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.