When taking my tenants to court for non-payment of rent, do I have to amend this same case if I later file another case against them for damages?

My tenants did not pay the money agreed upon in our rental contract, then decided to quit paying rent. I filed a civil lawsuit against them in the county where they were currently living in our rental house. We went to court on that case and it was settled. Later, tenants moved out (and moved to a different county) and we filed suit for damages in their home county. Judge threw our case out. He said we should have amended 1st one.

Asked on October 6, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Georgia

Answers:

FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

From what you have written, it seems that the reason why the judge dismissed your second lawsuit was because you filed suit initially against your former tenants and settled the dispute where the tenants eventually ended up moving out of the rental.

Under the law, if there was a claim that was pending (but not mentioned in the initial lawsuit) it should have been mentioned in the beginning and have been part of the settlement.

Under the laws of all states in this country, if one has a claim against a person that could have been asserted in a pending lawsuit but fails to do so, the claim is considered waived in that it should have been brought at that time. I sense that is what the judge did when he dismissed your second lawsuit when he said that you should have amended the first one.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.