Shouldn’t an officer get both sides of an accident?

I am 80 years old and have not had
an accident in 60 years of
driving.While backing out of my
driveway I noticed 3 vehicles at
the stop sign about a half block
away heading in the opposite
direction. Nothing was coming from
either direction, halfway out Bam
The rear of my car was torn up.The
third car decides to back up at a
fast speed,but the report said
that I didn’t yeild. The officer
never talked to me.He took the
word of the other driver who
insisted I just didn’t see her
because I am elderly.Her insurance
found her not accountable. Really
Who backs up from a stop sign
that fast and it was clear when I
backed out.It’s very unfair, how
should I handle this situation?
She lied and her witness lied

Asked on July 1, 2016 under Accident Law, Texas


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 4 years ago | Contributor

Her insurer is not a court--its determination is not legally binding. Rather, the insurer saying that its drive is not at fault is only the insurer saying that they are not going to voluntarily offer to pay you anything. However, you have the right to sue the other driver for compensation (e.g. the cost to repair your car or, if--as you indicate--it is totalled, it's then-current fair market or blue book value). If you can prove, such as through your testimony and the testimony of other witnesses, that the other driver was at fault, you can win the case and recover money from them. Of course, the police report going against you, while not definitive (i.e. it does not automatically mean you will lose) is unfortunate for you; it can and presumably will be used as evidence against you.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.