If my tree fell and hit my neighbor’s car, am I liable?

Asked on September 18, 2014 under Real Estate Law, Missouri


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 6 years ago | Contributor

The answer is, "it depends." Specifically, what it depends upon is whether you had any reason to know that the tree posed a particular threat--for example, was the tree visibily or obviously sick or dead? Was it leaning, so that it seemed like its roots were not holding? Had it been damaged, such as by a collision or lightning, or had its roots been damaged, such as by digging up the yard to put in pavers or walkway? Etc.

Liability in a case like this is based on fault. Fault is typically based on negligence, or unreasonable carelessness. If you had any reason to think that that the tree was a threat, but knowing of that threat, did not take action, that may have been negligent and could give rise to negligence.

On the other hand, if there was no reason to suspect a threat and a seemingly health tree feel (such as to due to high winds), you should not be liable.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.