Is there a legal recourse we can take against a builder for bad workmanship once our warranty has expired?

We bought our house 4 years ago and 11 months later had some water seep into our house. We were told that the flooding was due to little micro cracks in the outer stucco. The water settled between the foam and poured concrete of the wall and the water settled downward and sipped through into the house. The builder supposedly fixed the problem and repainted the house. Almost 3 years later, it rained again for a few days along with steady winds. We started to notice wet spots on the carpet.

Asked on October 18, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Florida

Answers:

FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

In many states the homeowner of new construction can bring an action against the builder or developer for latent (hidden) workmanship that manifests itself several years after the new construction has been completed even though the builder's warranty may have expired.

In California, the time period is a maximum of ten (10) years after the construction has been completed. Potentially your claims against the builder might not be time barred by the statute of limitations if you recently discovered the water intrusion issues and your state might have a similar time for a staute of limitations for latent defects of new construction.

I recommend that you consult with an attorney who practices construction law.

Good luck.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.