Is the following legal?

I work in Pittsburgh, Pa. at Mosebach Manufacturing as a QC Supervisor. Yesterday
at 930am I asked for FMLA paperwork because I am going to need to get some
testing and maybe surgery done. At 230 pm yesterday, I was laid off. I am a
salary worker and middle of the road in seniority in my department. Nobody else
was laid off. Also, it seemed odd I got laid off on a Monday when I get paid for
the entire week regardless. I just wanted to know if I had just cause for legal

Asked on June 1, 2016 under Employment Labor Law, Pennsylvania


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 4 years ago | Contributor

You very likely have a case for illegal retaliation against you for using your FMLA rights. An employee *may* be laid off after requesting FMLA leave, IF the lay off can be proven to have been in the works before hand and to be supported by non-FMLA reasons, such as business reduction or downturn...but the situation you describe, of one, mid-seniority employee being laid off without warning the day he/she asked for FMLA leave makes it very unlikely that the company could establish a valid, non-FMLA reason for the layoff. Similarly, an employee could be terminated after requesting FMLA paperwork if there was some documented problem or issue (e.g. absenteeism, sexually harassing other employees, documented poor performance, etc.) and the termination was also in the works ahead of time--an employee can't use FMLA to short-circuit an otherwise valid termination. But again, that would not seem to be the case here, because you do not write about any significant work-related issues.
Based on what you write, you should contact the federal or state department of labor to file a FMLA retaliation complaint.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.