Is it legal for an employer to cut a person’s hours to get an employee to quit?

The employer is hiring new employees but cutting hours of existing employees. I this illegal? It appears that the employer is looking to

hire 20-25 year olds and cutting hours of 50-60 year olds. Hours have been slowly cut. In past 6 years I have worked 18-24 hours

average a week. Now I am being scheduled for 6-10 maximum because they have hired new people and cut my hours. When I asked about this I was told that the younger people needed the money more than I. I was told that I needed to decide if the amount of hours was enough. That is all they can offer as business is slow. If business is slow, why are they hiring? I think they want me to quit. If I quit can I apply for unemployment until I find a new job which is more challenging at 60 years old.

Asked on March 20, 2017 under Employment Labor Law, California

Answers:

M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 3 years ago | Contributor

Most employment relationships are "at will". This means that a company can set the conditions of work much as it sees fit, that is unless doing so violates the terms of a union agreement or employment contract. Also, an employee's treatment must not constitute some form of legally actionable discrimination. In this case, you may well have a claim for discrimination based on age (over 40). At this point you can file a complaint with your state's department of labor and/or consut directly with an employment law attorney.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.