Is it discrimination to tell employees they are not allowed to smoke outside in designated smoking areas?

I work in a non-smoking hotel with outside designated smoking areas.
Employees are not given breaks nor lunch hours. They eat or take a
break only when they can not for more than a few minutes. Now they
are being told they can no longer smoke. Employees who smoke are now
expected to go eight hours without doing so. Is this legal?

Asked on September 22, 2018 under Employment Labor Law, Texas


M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 2 years ago | Contributor

In order to make a claim for "discrimination" in the workplace, an employee's treatment must be based on their inclusion in a legally "protected class" (i.e. must be based their on race, religion, nationality, age (over 40), gender or disability). Merely receiving treated lesser treatment due to your being a smoker does not constitute a form of legally actionable discrimination since smoking is not legally protected. The fact is that absent such discrimination or an employment/union agreement to the contrary or discrimination, not all workers need be treated the same or even fairly.

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 2 years ago | Contributor

It is perfectly legal. People often think "discrimination" is any treatment they feel unfair or unwarranted, but in an employment context, "discrimination" is only treating someone worse or differently due to one of a few specifically defined reasons, princapally due to his/her race, color, national origin, age 40 or over, religion, disability, or sex. However, "smoker" is not a protected category, so there there is no protection afforded to smoking; an employer may restrict or even ban it outright for its employees any way it wants.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.