Is a liscensed mechanic have a duty to check entire brake system after replacing front brakes

I took my 1 ton van in to a mechanic to have it’s rotors pads changed. The old rotors were tore up the old pads were the wrong ones. The day I received the van back, I suggested to him that the brakes might need to be bled, as the were still ‘squishy’. He scheduled me for an appointment a week and a half later, when that time came, he said he didn’t have time and brushed me off. That was late March 2016. Last week, I am driving the van doing some errands, I came to a school zone with reduced speed and my brakes completely failed. Luckily, no one was hurt or any property damaged as I was able to get the van to stop by slamming the transmission into park. I returned to the mechanic and was told he was not responsible, that the job he did was fine. I took it to a Napa mechanic who said the rear brakes were shot, fluid was leaking and my master cylinder needed replacing. My questions are- should the first mechanic inspected the entire brake system before he released the van to me, and if so, what can I do, or should I do?

Asked on May 10, 2016 under Accident Law, Arizona


S.L,. Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 4 years ago | Contributor

In order to have a claim for negligence against the first mechanic, you will have to prove that a reasonable mechanic would have inspected the entire brake system after replacing the front brakes.  Even if you are able to prove that, you would also have to prove damages (monetary compensation).  Since no one was injured and no property was damaged when you were able to stop the van, you would not prevail in a lawsuit for negligence against the mechanic.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.