If a landlord revokes rights to balcony for about 2 months and requires a tenant to store furniture inside, is this a case for constructive eviction?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If a landlord revokes rights to balcony for about 2 months and requires a tenant to store furniture inside, is this a case for constructive eviction?
Landlord sent written notices that major renovations were to begin on apartment building including window replacements and new siding. The landlord is requiring tenants to remove patio furniture from balconies and store furnishings indoors. Also, the tenant will not have access to their balcony for about 8 weeks. Tenants are being remind to shut blinds for privacy as the renovations are to take place but also the contractor is securing newly replaced windows with pink film for the duration of the renovations (about 8 weeks). Does this scenario fall under constructive eviction?
Asked on June 1, 2012 under Real Estate Law, Virginia
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 11 years ago | Contributor
Constructive eviction occurs when residential rental property is an uninhabitable condition. The uninhabitable condition makes the property unsuitable to live in, forcing the tenant to leave the property. Although I can see how these renovations may be inconvenient they do not seem to be denying you use of the apartment, only the balcony. It does not stop your entry or egress, etc., And if the repairs are structural or required or improvements then the landlord may indeed have a right to do as you have stated. I would, though, ask for an abatement of the rent given that a portion of the rented apartment is unusable for the 8 weeks. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.