If I rear-ended a reckless driver who wasn’t following traffic laws, is there any way I can fight this?

The other day while I was driving home I got stuck behind a car going 5 miles under the speed limit. He

was going 30 in a 35 mph zone with no visible cars in front of him and a huge line of cars behind me. At first I was following too closely, miles away from where the accident happened, and he slammed on his brakes. I then started following 3-4 car lengths away. He still would brake suddenly out of nowhere and was still going under the speed limit. This continued for miles. While merging onto a highway – the lane we are in goes straight onto the highway, the speed limit goes from 35 to 55 mph on a very steep hill and another lane to the right merges into us. At the top of the hill he starts slow, then accelerates very quickly, and at the bottom of the hill right where the other lane merges into us and the speed limit is 55 he stops. There was no traffic ahead, no one in front of him, no reason for him to stop. I was still pretty far away from him but my brakes aren’t the best, I had a line of cars that were following me very closely and I was on a very steep hill so I did rear end him. Luckily I was able to brake enough and it didn’t cause too much damage, was maybe going 10-15 mph. When we got to the side of the road, he didn’t speak English very well and just kept saying,

Asked on November 4, 2017 under Accident Law, Washington

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 3 years ago | Contributor

Unfortunately, in the law's eyes, you are 100% at fault.
You write that "who assumes somone's going to stop after accelerating to 55 and the road is clear straight ahead," but by that point, you had seen him "brake suddenly out of nowhere" for "miles"--that is, you had ample warning that he was driving erractically. Furthermore, you evidently knew your brakes had issues ("my brakes weren't the best"), and you obviously could see and knew that you were on a "very steep hill." Adding those facts to the general obligation to maintain such safe following distance that, given driving conditions, speed, the condition of your car, etc., the law would consider you to be at fault for not staying far enough back that you could have stopped in time. He may have been driving badly--but you should still have been able to avoid him. Based on what you write you would be liable.  In the future, either stay *far* back from drivers like this, or pass them if you can, or turn off and take a different route, or stop for coffee to let them get away from you, etc.
He cannot simply make up injuries or car damage to sue you for, however: anything he would sue you for must be supported by evidence.
Since you evidently have insurance, let you insurance handle this--it's what you have insurance for.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.