What to do ifa type of claim that was previously made is no longer being honored by an insurer?

I lease out a taxi to a driver. It was hit by another vehicle. Their insurance is refusing to pay for the loss of income from this vehicle. I have had this happen before, and they always have paid for the loss. Suddenly the insurer got it in their heads that they don’t have to. Does anyone know what I need to do to resolve this? Is there a legal statute that I can show them, or a former case that shows it? I’m at my wit’s end.

Asked on September 22, 2011 under Accident Law, Minnesota

Answers:

MD, Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

Before you go to case law or otherwise, you need to figure out if this insurance company's policy is different than the others you had. If this is the insurance policy of the cab driver, then it should be the same. File a complaint with your state's insurance department and make sure you file it as bad faith coverage or insurance fraud. If this is the fault of your driver and the insurance company refuses to pay (and it is the cab driver's insurance), still file the complaint with the insurance department. If this is the other driver's fault and that other driver's insurance won't pay, and it was the same insurance company, show your claims from the previous events by informing them they paid out on x y and z and if they refuse to pay on this claim, you will report them to both the insurance department in your state and the state attorney general.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.