Can we hold previous owner liable for work that is not up to code if he failed to get any permits for extensive work and did not disclose that to us?

Previous owner was a contractor who did all of the work, he never lived in the house so we agreed to the waiver on the “seller’s disclosure alternatives”. We recently discovered work that was clearly not up to code and that’s why we checked the permitting. The work involved major duct and plumbing work – including moving the furnace and water heater. All items which require permits in our city.

Asked on July 18, 2012 under Real Estate Law, Minnesota


Ian Kravitz / Malka & Kravitz, P.A.

Answered 8 years ago | Contributor

Generally, if the selelr intentionally withheld material facts in an effort to defraud you under circustances where you may not have otherwise purchased the home, you should be entitled to some relief.  A lot will depend on whether you could have discovered these issues upon a reasonable inspection, and what in fact the seller knew.  With the seller being a contractor, that second analysis should be rather easy to prove.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.