Can a person in the last stages of Alzheimer’s legally change a Will?


Asked on July 11, 2014 under Estate Planning, Indiana


M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 6 years ago | Contributor

Wills are generally contested either of 2 grounds. The first is that the testator (i.e. the person making the Will) lacked "testamentary capacity"; this means that they were incompetent to make (change) a Will at the time of signing it. The second ground is that because of the testator's mental state, they were subject to "undue influence"; this means there was evidence of coercion, manipulation, deception, compulsion, intimidation, etc.

In the case of Alzheimer's, in the early stages a testator may have the requisite capacity to understand, know or recognize that a Will is being made; the extent of their estate; who the beneficiaries are; and the manner in which their will be distributed (e.g. what will be kept in the family or sold). They could also have had the ability to make free choices in distribution of the estate, thereby negating the argument of having been unduly influenced in the making of their Will.

That having been said, someone who has been medically determined to have been in the last stages of Alzheimer's would be deemed to have lacked the requisite testamentary capacity to have executed a Will and/or the Will could be challenged as to just how free their choice was in determining beneficiaries and what their share of the estate would be, etc. In fact, any time a person has Alzheimer's and executes a Will, there is always the potential for a Will contest even if the testator was in the early stages of the disease and the time of signing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.