Breach of Independent Contractor Agreement

I have an independent contractor agreement with a customer that outlines the services and terms of our relationship. Within this contract there is a section called

Asked on April 19, 2017 under Business Law, Colorado


S.L,. Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 3 years ago | Contributor

From your description of the contract, it appears that your performance is in lots which means that you do work and you are paid on the first.  Then you do additional work and are paid on the fifteenth. 
When there is a contract where performance is in lots, a breach of contract is limited to that particular portion of the contract.  In other words, if payment is due on the first and is late, only that part of the contract is breached and it does not affect future performance and future payment.  So, you can only sue for that particular breach of the contract, but would have to continue with your performance (work) regarding future work and payment.  If another payment is late, it would again be a breach of that item without affecting the other contract provisions.  Therefore, you would still have to provide the 30-day notice of termination and be subject to the non-competitive provision as the rest of the contract remains enforceable.
If the contract had been written so that you had an entire job to complete and it wasn't in installments or lots, then if payment had been late, you could sue immediately for breach of the entire contract and the other provisions (30-day notice and non-competitive agreement) would not be enforceable. 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.