The bank owned T/H flooded, our insurance paid for new carpeting, but now there's mold behind walls. Ins. Co. denying adjustment to claim.

Question Details: The pipes burst in the neighboring vacant T/H over winter. The unit was in foreclosure and was owned by Bank of America. Our Ins. Co. (Allstate) intially paid for carpet, molding and curtains, but would not consider wall replacement because wall appeared dry. There were no further leaks from neighboring unit. The bank owned unit has now been sold and repaired. However, insulation behind paneling in our unit was saturated and later resulted in mold behind walls. Ins. Co. denied claim adjustment stating clause in policy regarding water seepage.

Asked 9/8/2009 under Insurance Law | 179 View(s) | More Legal Topics

Are you an attorney? Sign up to answer this question.

Insurance Law Law Answers

Whether or not your policy will cover the damage depends on the exact wording or language. However, even if your policy will not cover, you might want to consider suing the then-owner of the other unit (Bank of America) for the damage that their water pipe caused to your home--since it was the bank's pipe at the time, they would be responsible.

Related Insurance Law Questions

Didn't find your answer? Ask.

  Top Ranking Attorneys

Sign Up Today! Are you a lawyer?
Want to be featured here?
Sign up for a free profile and get started today! Click Here

More Questions Like This...

AttorneyPages.com