Does my roommate, who co-owns the house with me, have a right to have his girlfriend live with us?

Question Details: I own a home with two friends. We have lived together almost 10 years and bought the house 2 years ago. One roommate asked if his girlfriend could move in with us "temporarily" in exchange for a nominal $500 "rent". We agreed and a year has now gone by. Myself and the other roommate would like the girlfriend to move out. When we explained this to our third roommate he said that as a co-owner he has a right to have guests as long as he pleases. Is this true? Do we have any recourse to kick the girlfriend out?

Asked 11/6/2009 under Real Estate | 289 View(s) | More Legal Topics

Are you an attorney? Sign up to answer this question.

Real Estate Law Answers

Robert Spitz / Robert J. Spitz, Attorney at Law Answered 2 years ago | Contributor This attorney is licensed in California

These actions could be in breach of the original agreement, in which case you could have damages against your co-owner.  It might be time to dissolve this relationship as another alternative.   If you would like further legal assistance in resolving this situation, contact my office.

Robert J. Spitz

909 395 0909

I think most courts would hold that your friend, as an owner of the property, has the right to use it as much as he pleases, as long as he doesn't exclude you and the other co-owner;  I think most courts would decide that the roommate's ownership rights include having his girlfriend move in with him.

To get past that, you'd have to show some sort of contractual agreement that he's breaking by doing this.  If you don't have anything in writing, about your shared ownership and use of the building, you'd have to try to convince a court that either the past course of conduct, in how you had been living together, created a contract implied in fact, and that's a long shot.  Or, you might argue that there was a contract for her to be there only "temporarily," but that word might make the whole setup too vague to enforce.  A creative approach would use the agreement to pay "rent," "temporarily", not as something to enforce in and of itself, but as evidence of that contract implied in fact.  A good lawyer just might be able to sell that, to the right judge.

Related Real Estate Questions

Didn't find your answer? Ask.

  Top Ranking Attorneys

Sign Up Today! Are you a lawyer?
Want to be featured here?
Sign up for a free profile and get started today! Click Here

More Questions Like This...

AttorneyPages.com