Can the police arrest and convict someone of burglary with only circumstantial evidence?

Question Details:

The suspect has had no police contact since the incident occurred but his name was used in a search warrant on another persons house. The police have been questioning all acquaintances but have no confession or witnesses or evidence from the scene. They have pin pointed their suspect based on phone records and purely circumstantial evidence. It has been 3 months since the alleged incident and no contact has been made to the suspect in question. The suspect also has no criminal record is well respected and had no motive to commit a crime. What do the police need to arrest and make a conviction?

Asked 1/16/2012 under Criminal Defense | 178 View(s) | More Legal Topics

Are you an attorney? Sign up to answer this question.

Criminal Defense Law Answers

Russ Pietryga / Pietryga Law Office Answered 4 months ago | Contributor This attorney is licensed in Utah

First, the polce do not decide whether to charge a person with a crime.  The prosecuting attorney does.  Usually, the prosecuting attorney will recieve all the evidence from the police and screne it for charges.  If, during the screening, the prosecuting attorney decides there is enough evidence to convict someone of the charge, they can file it with the court.

Circumstancial evidence is inderect evidence; secondary facts by which a principal fact may be rationally inferred.

So, yes, you can be charged solely on circumstancial evidence.  But it should be hard to get a conviction.  Lots of people are charged with crimes that are never convicted.

Hope this helps.

Related Criminal Defense Questions

Didn't find your answer? Ask.

AttorneyPages.com

  Top Ranking Attorneys

Sign Up Today! Are you a lawyer?
Want to be featured here?
Sign up for a free profile and get started today! Click Here

More Questions Like This...